<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: McAfee Total Protection Suite 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://antivirus.reviewcity.net/featured/mcafee-total-protection-suite-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://antivirus.reviewcity.net/featured/mcafee-total-protection-suite-2010/</link>
	<description>Antivirus Security Product Reviews</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2011 02:21:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alton Tripp</title>
		<link>http://antivirus.reviewcity.net/featured/mcafee-total-protection-suite-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>Alton Tripp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 16:53:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antivirus.reviewcity.net/?p=2279#comment-883</guid>
		<description>I used McAfee AV Plus products for years, and when I saw the $40 price for Total Protection 2010, I upgraded to that product. The first machine I installed it on has a 2.7GHz Pentium 4 single processor with 1GB RAM and is running under XP Professional SP3. The computer appeared to lose about half its processing power once Total Protection was installed, and that&#039;s in comparison to running with McAfee AV Plus 2009. I couldn&#039;t stand the perfomance hit, so I purged all McAfee SW off the computer and went to the Microsoft Security Essentials, which was a free package and apparently works well. Barring a miraculous improvement in the performance hit when running Total Protection, I will not my subscription to McAfee when it expires later this year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used McAfee AV Plus products for years, and when I saw the $40 price for Total Protection 2010, I upgraded to that product. The first machine I installed it on has a 2.7GHz Pentium 4 single processor with 1GB RAM and is running under XP Professional SP3. The computer appeared to lose about half its processing power once Total Protection was installed, and that&#8217;s in comparison to running with McAfee AV Plus 2009. I couldn&#8217;t stand the perfomance hit, so I purged all McAfee SW off the computer and went to the Microsoft Security Essentials, which was a free package and apparently works well. Barring a miraculous improvement in the performance hit when running Total Protection, I will not my subscription to McAfee when it expires later this year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: high detection</title>
		<link>http://antivirus.reviewcity.net/featured/mcafee-total-protection-suite-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-571</link>
		<dc:creator>high detection</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antivirus.reviewcity.net/?p=2279#comment-571</guid>
		<description>McAfee Best AntiVrus In The World :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McAfee Best AntiVrus In The World <img src='http://antivirus.reviewcity.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

